“That’s about right.”

A TikToker says he was pressured to pay hundreds of {dollars} after taking a selfie exterior the viral mirrored “Invisible House” he rented in Joshua Tree. However, some viewers don’t imagine the story.

Featured Video

What occurred on the Invisible House?

The Instagram-worthy property prices round $2,400 an evening to hire on Airbnb. Mirrors round the home make it seem “invisible” within the desert panorama. The house has been featured in journey collection The World’s Most Amazing Vacation Rentals and has appeared in actuality exhibits like Bling Empire.

In a video with over 897,000 views, TikToker Sean Davis (@seanmdavis) warns viewers that the “invisible house” was really a “nightmare.”

Davis explains within the caption that he rented the home for a photoshoot exterior. While the itemizing doesn’t word the restriction, the TikToker says that the property expenses for pictures.

“Sleeping there is the worst part. You can’t see out of the house at night but can see in perfectly,” Davis says. “Worst part is it cracks like a skyscraper all night and is so loud.”

@seanmdavis We rented the invisible home in Joshua Tree for a photograph shoot exterior. We didn’t allow them to know we have been taking some photographs exterior and received shook down for 20k over a selfie tagging a model not even mine. Sleeping there’s a the worst half. You can’t see out of the home at evening however can see In completely. Worst half is it cracks like a sky scrapper all evening and is so loud. #fyp #journey #invisiblehouse #palmsprings #joshuatree ♬ оригинальный звук – tenly

“We didn’t let them know we were taking some photos outside and got shook down for 20k over a selfie tagging a brand not even mine,” he writes. He continues that there have been different points with the property, like a loud creaking noise at evening.

In a follow-up video, Davis clarifies the occasions that led to the astronomical charge for a selfie.

“We didn’t actually shoot any brand content in the house. We shot outside, but they had an issue with a selfie,” Davis writes within the caption. “A friend’s GF took a photo in the bathroom and tagged a brand that got reposted by the brand. It wasn’t even my brand. We paid 10k for the house and another 10k because of the photo.”

Do viewers suppose he ought to have been charged the charge?

In the feedback, viewers word that properties usually have separate costs for trip and enterprise leases.

“My uncle has an Airbnb, and the daily rate is $1,000, but brand shoots are $10k. Seems pretty standard,” one shares.

“As someone who used to run a property with frequent filming, that’s about right. It’s industry standard to pay for locations for commercial advertising use. Welcome to the industry! No one makes this same mistake twice!” one other writes.

“Yeah, there is a massive risk when people use private property that is rented out for commercial use when a contract states it is for private use. That is fair,” a 3rd provides.

The Daily Dot reached out to Davis for additional remark.

The web is chaotic—however we’ll break it down for you in a single each day e mail. Sign up for the Daily Dot’s publication right here.