Hank Green’s newest SciShow video, “Physicists Don’t Understand Why Knitting Works,” sparked frustration amongst knitters on-line. The episode explored how physicists examine knit materials, however many viewers felt it minimized the technical depth and historical past of the craft.

Featured Video

In the video, Green framed knitting as easy loops and patterns. However, longtime knitters argued that the method ignored centuries of innovation and mathematical problem-solving.

As many famous, the episode oversimplified the sophisticated nature of knitting and the way a lot math it entails.

What the video coated and the way SciShow works

SciShow, launched in 2012, is a YouTube community dedicated to science communication. The essential channel, hosted by Green and particular visitors, has spawned area of interest spin-offs, together with one for teenagers. New movies drop a number of occasions every week, normally breaking down advanced science matters for a large viewers.

In this case, the video tried to clarify why knit materials behave the best way they do underneath stress. In the video, Green described stitches as “knots” that calm down into low-energy states. He then in contrast material stretch to a ball rolling down a driveway. He additionally instructed knitting advanced largely “through intuition and trial and error,” a line that knitters strongly disputed.

To complicate issues, knitters rapidly identified factual errors. The episode referenced a sock that some viewers mistakenly thought was a sock pattern from early CE Egypt. The historic maker crafted this older sock through nålebinding, a a lot older approach that makes use of precise knots.

The video additionally mislabeled a “stockinette stitch” whereas exhibiting a reverse stockinette sample. Even small particulars, like calling yarn “string,” bothered knitters who noticed these errors as indicators of carelessness.

On X, knitters expressed disappointment in blunt phrases. One wrote, “The knitting community is upset with Hank Green’s recent video, and I have no one to talk to about it.” Another admitted they have been “usually a Hank Green defender, but I’m joining the war on the side of knitting.”

Some emphasised how technical the craft is, with @romanticaIlyurs tweeting that “textile crafts are undervalued because of misogyny! They’re seen as frivolous and idle hobbies when actually they’re incredibly difficult TECHNOLOGIES to master.”

Others merely discovered humor within the state of affairs. “Seeing Hank Green get absolutely dragged by the humorless lib knitting community over his latest SciShow episode is the funniest thing I’ve seen in weeks,” wrote @grac3nTruth.

YouTuber Deborah Knits went into element, breaking down all the main points that the SciShow video missed or acquired mistaken, ending with a proposal to Green to show him how you can knit.

On TikTookay, reactions went deeper. One creator highlighted how Green’s framing mirrored “a lack of consideration and care for the subject he’s talking about.” She additionally added that somebody who isn’t educated in a area ought to let the consultants communicate.

Another TikToker, Angela Baker (@parkrosepermaculture), posted an in depth ten-minute critique. She defined that the video “did a tremendous disservice to the science, the art, and the craft of knitting.”

@parkrosepermaculture #greenscreenvideo @Hank Green #knitters #knitting #knittersoftiktok #fiberart #knit #engineering #scilab ♬ authentic sound – Parkrose Permaculture

She argued that knitting has lengthy been tied to resistance actions, business, and coded communication, not simply physics experiments.

@mandilovesteeth Hank Green/SciShow please go ask the consultants subsequent time …. #knitting #knittersoftiktok #fiberarts ♬ authentic sound – 🦷🧚

SciShow’s response to the backlash

In the YouTube feedback, producer Jess acknowledged the backlash. They clarified a number of errors that have been missed by the knitters on the manufacturing crew. They admitted that some terminology and visuals have been incorrect.

Jess famous “a mislabelled visual of reverse stockinette doesn’t invalidate the trustworthiness and value of the science lessons in this video.” They additionally emphasised that SciShow usually simplifies materials for accessibility. In this case, nonetheless, the simplifying language might have alienated knitters, which was not their intention.

As Jess concluded, “The goal of this video was to demonstrate that though knitting and knit fabric might seem simple and ubiquitous, their versatility, complexity, and beauty have far-reaching applications.”

The web is chaotic—however we’ll break it down for you in a single every day e-mail. Sign up for the Daily Dot’s e-newsletter right here.